The Forgotten: The Dead of the 8th Alabama Infantry at Gettysburg

With this article on the 8th Alabama Infantry and subsequent list of men, I’m starting a periodic feature on men whose combat deaths caused them to disappear and effectively be forgotten. The average age of a soldier killed at Gettysburg was roughly 22 to 23. He was typically not married and had no children. As a result, within a generation, there were no direct family members left to carry on the memories of these men. I have consulted numerous sources, but relied heavily on Busey and Busey, Confederate Casualties at Gettysburg. I am not listing every man in the Busey or Coco or other records. Rather, I am listing men for which no family tree entry could be found on major ancestry sites (FamilySearch, Ancestry). In the cases of these men, I have created a basic entry for them so that possible family members may be able to research them further and connect them to family trees. A FamilySearch ID is provided for each man. FamilySearch is free to sign up for and use.

The 8th Alabama Infantry fought at Gettysburg as part of the Army of Northern Virginia in Cadmus M. Wilcox’s brigade within Richard H. Anderson’s division (Third Corps under Ambrose P. Hill). The regiment did not fight on the opening day; Hilary A. Herbert later recalled Anderson’s division halted roughly two miles away, hearing the battle but not committed.

On the second day, the regiment’s day began with a sharp skirmish and then long hours awaiting orders behind a rock fence; late in the afternoon it joined Wilcox’s advance, became separated from the rest of the brigade, crossed the Emmitsburg Road/turnpike to the right of a cluster of houses, pressed toward the Trostle area, and overran a group of guns and caissons before being forced to retire without the crucial reinforcements Wilcox repeatedly requested.

This was part of Longstreet’s massive assault, and the 8th Alabama is often commingled with the charge of William Barksdale’s Brigade. Wilcox’s Brigade advanced immediately to the left of Barksdale’s Mississippi Brigade. The two assaults were structurally separate but tactically contiguous. On the ground — amid smoke, artillery fire, and collapsing Federal lines — Mississippians and Alabamians advanced within sight of one another and, in places, intermingled.

The 8th Alabama’s story at Gettysburg lies in that overlap: adjacent to one of the battle’s most famous charges, engaged in some of its most chaotic fighting, and leaving behind men whose burial places remain uncertain.


July 2: The 8th Alabama Infantry Advances Past the Peach Orchard

The Official Records (Series I, Vol. 27, Pt. II) show Wilcox’s Brigade moving forward in support of and slightly behind Barksdale’s breakthrough at the Peach Orchard. As Barksdale’s Mississippians smashed the Union III Corps salient along the Emmitsburg Road, Wilcox advanced south of the orchard toward the Trostle Farm, Plum Run, and the lower slopes leading toward Cemetery Ridge.

The 8th Alabama crossed open ground under heavy artillery fire. Federal batteries along Cemetery Ridge and near the Trostle buildings poured canister and shell into the advancing line. As the Union III Corps collapsed, the Confederate advance temporarily surged forward beyond the Emmitsburg Road.

Harry Pfanz in Gettysburg: The Second Day describes this sector as one of the most fluid and violent of the afternoon — a breakthrough that outran its support. Wilcox’s men, including the 8th Alabama, found themselves exposed as Union reinforcements from the II and VI Corps stabilized the line.

When the Federal counterattack came, it came hard.

Wilcox later reported the severe artillery fire that struck his brigade as it advanced toward Cemetery Ridge. The 8th Alabama suffered most of its Gettysburg casualties in this forward movement on July 2.


Not Barksdale’s Brigade — But Part of the Same Wave

It would be inaccurate to describe the 8th Alabama as formally participating in “Barksdale’s Charge.” They were not part of Barksdale’s Mississippi Brigade.

However, it is accurate to say:

  • They advanced immediately to Barksdale’s left.
  • Their assault was part of the same coordinated Longstreet attack.
  • The fighting overlapped geographically and chronologically.
  • Accounts from the field describe brigade lines blending under pressure.

Modern historians sometimes refer to the “Barksdale–Wilcox sector” of the assault, reflecting how the Confederate attack front functioned as a continuous wave despite separate command structures.

For men on the ground, distinctions of brigade were often lost in smoke and momentum.


July 3: The Advance After Pickett’s Charge

The 8th Alabama did not remain idle on July 3.

After Pickett’s Division stepped off in its famous assault against Cemetery Ridge, Wilcox’s Brigade advanced on Pickett’s right flank. The movement was intended to support and exploit any breakthrough.

The 8th Alabama moved forward under punishing artillery fire. Unlike July 2, this advance did not result in a deep penetration of Union lines. Pickett’s Charge failed, and Wilcox’s Brigade fell back.

Casualties on July 3 were lighter than the previous day but not nonexistent. They did advance — but in a supporting role and without a prolonged engagement.

Most of the regiment’s fatal casualties occurred on July 2.


Where the 8th Alabama Fell

Based on brigade alignment and casualty timing, the likely areas of death for many July 2 fatalities include:

  • South and southeast of the Peach Orchard
  • East of the Emmitsburg Road
  • Near the Trostle Farm
  • In the low ground approaching Plum Run
  • Around the Schwartz and Bream farm properties

The identification of the Schwartz/Bream area as a probable initial burial zone is consistent with Wilcox’s axis of advance.

Unlike Confederate units that died holding ground, Wilcox’s Brigade advanced into forward positions that were ultimately abandoned. When Union forces reoccupied the ground, Federal burial parties interred Confederate dead where they fell.

Accounts confirm that burials began quickly after the battle. Rain on July 4 further complicated matters. Confederate dead were typically buried in shallow trenches or individual graves marked temporarily — if at all.

When later reinterments occurred for transport south, identification depended on surviving markers, personal effects, or comrades’ testimony. Many were recorded simply as “Unknown Confederate.”

Men who fell in exposed, advanced ground were particularly vulnerable to permanent loss of identity.


The Men Who Were Never Recovered

The subset of 8th Alabama soldiers listed below — mostly men killed July 2 whose names do not appear in major genealogical databases — fits a pattern common among Confederate units engaged in forward assaults.

Several were:

  • Reported killed July 2
  • Later ambiguously listed as wounded or missing
  • Absent from Federal prisoner rolls despite claims of capture
  • Without clear final burial locations

This strongly suggests battlefield death followed by incomplete Confederate reporting during withdrawal.

For example:

  • Soldiers recorded as “wounded and captured” but absent from Union POW records were likely killed where they fell.
  • Those not reported missing until months later may have been assumed dead after no further word.

Because Wilcox’s Brigade withdrew from advanced ground, many of the 8th Alabama’s July 2 dead were likely buried by Union burial details near the Schwartz, Bream, Trostle, or Emmitsburg Road sectors.

Some may rest today among unidentified Confederate graves reinterred in southern cemeteries. Others may remain in unmarked ground.


Why They Disappeared from Record

The absence of genealogical entries does not mean these men lacked families. It may reflect:

  • Postwar migration
  • Poverty and limited pension access
  • Destroyed county records
  • Families unable to retrieve or identify remains
  • Reconstruction-era instability in Alabama communities

Units that advanced too far and then retreated often left their dead in enemy hands. Documentation suffered accordingly.

The 8th Alabama’s losses at Gettysburg illustrate how battlefield geography shaped memory.

Men who died holding ground were more likely to be marked.

Men who died in a breakthrough that failed were more likely to vanish.


The following are the men who were presumed killed from the 8th Alabama at Gettysburg and for whom no connection to family has been established in major genealogical databases. Readers who wish to research them for possible fits with their families can find the entries at FamilySearch. The FamilySearch ID allows you to search by ID and bring up the person.

Daubach, John H.
Davis, William J.
John J. Johnson
Kelly, Henry H.
McKnight, James
Partridge, H.H.
Phillips, Benjamin H.
Tallen, Joseph B.
Tucker, David
Wilson, E.J.
Wright, Henry
Benton, B.P.
Betts, William S.
Buckner, Mike W.
Bulger, Lovick Pierce
Burnett, William A.
McGraw, William H.
Carr, William
Fallon, Thomas
Cashin, John
Carleton, William E.

P4R1-6P5
P4T6-F8Y
PWRV-GV2
PWT8-TH7
PWRR-ZQ9
P4TM-7WD
PWRR-N4N
P3J2-QQH
PC9B-S9Q
P3J2-PQJ
P3KB-JKL
Possibly part of this family: G2Z3-47L
LTRP-J61
LCQM-N1D
97LQ-97S
GKXJ-5B4
Possibly part of this family: MP8Y-6F8
P41F-QGX
KJPJ-V2K
P41Y-TLC
PHMH-21H

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Gettysburg Network of 1863

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading